|
PEZ-Test: Colnago
C50 vs. C40
Tuesday,
December 23, 2003 7:35:41 PM PT
by
Charles Manantan
 |
|
When you’re in a bike battle with
Colnago, it’s best to fight pasta with pasta, so to see
how the new World Champs Edition C50 stacks up, we
thought we would stand it next to the tried and tested
C40 and see if the hoopla is all it’s cracked up to be…
| So there I am taking pics side
by side, just as the 50 was freshly minted (thanks Dan and
Cale), when along comes a riding buddy on his self-purchased
early Christmas present who looks over at the wall and sees
the new one right next to the old.
Does he stop? Nope.
Does he slow down? Yeah, just long enough to say OH, I
*!ing HATE YOU!

So starts
the evaluation…
When you compare high end bike
companies, several conclusions can be drawn about their
passion for the sport and care for the products they produce
simply by looking at their special edition
bikes.
Colnago have done a tremendous job creating
frames like the CF1, CF3 and the latest 50th Anniversary
Edition from scratch to give their customers a truly special
bike.
In contrast, a few of Colnago’s competitors in
the last year have taken a stock frame and done little more
than add a few stickers of old riders or changed the clear
coat color. These companies then add a few tweaked parts and
think that because they sell the unit for double or triple the
cost of the stock bike, it qualifies as “special”. What is
funny is that both the manufacturers I am thinking of can’t
even be bothered to make these bikes in more than a couple
sizes, because the Standard frames that they masquerade as
“special” are built in only a few sizes to cut corners in the
first place. (If you shelled out for one of these, I didn’t
mean to offend you!... Sucker.)
To me, it’s a
testament to Colnago’s effort to do something truly special,
and that commitment to offer something special shows in their
stock frames as well.
Colnago’s C40 has been widely
regarded as the frame to have. There are very few people who
are not fans of the Colnago line and the C40 in particular.
For each person that wouldn’t want one, there are a hundred
that would. The C40 has been Colnago’s World-Beater. It simply
gave people more of the things they want in a frame, while
sacrificing less. It is first and foremost a frame that you
can ride fast for long distances and do so comfortably. It is
a nasty combination of Paris-Roubaix toughness and feather
weight in a vibration damping material. It has Colnago’s sense
of tradition in look and was designed well enough that only
minor changes were needed for years. Only recently have
competitors like Kuota, Argon18 and Giant begun to use more of
the capacity of Carbon Fiber to build what are turning out to
be the Ultimate bikes to have, so Colnago didn’t need to do
much to stay ahead of the game, but this year they made enough
of a change to bring on the next number…
From 40 To
50
At first glance, you won’t notice the changes from
the 40 to the 50. The cleanly shaped top and down tubes, the
smooth integration of tube into Lug is all classic Colnago.
What you can’t see is what lies beneath the surface - and that
is a new Higher Modulus Carbon that allows for a larger
diameter Top and Down Tube (By about 12%). Side by side you
can see the tubes are larger and it’s to address the only weak
spot I thought my C40 had and that was that it needed a bit
more stiffness. They increased tube size all over the bike
(except the B-stay area) and did it substantially, but the
frame weight is only @ 15 Grams heavier thanks to the new
Carbon used.
One obvious change
is in the Chain stays. The 50’s stays are a full 11.8cm at the
bulge vs. the C40’s 7.5 cm at the same point (that’s a 36%
bump). The HP section is also more refined than last years HP
(HP was not a feature on our World Champs
C40).

Colnago have
finally gone from a 1 inch to a 1.125 headset as well, so the
head tube and lug are larger (and stiffer). They remain true
to function though staying with a more traditional threadless
headset. But unfortunately at time of test they only have the
Force Carbon Fork available.
So let’s
get to it! We tried keeping the Bikes “apples to
apples”. The saddle stays the same in the Selle Italia Prolink
Trans AM. The Seat post is Colnago’s and they did a slightly
better job with the clamp. It has smoother sides now, but it’s
still a proprietary size (damn it…) and is also still features
the “one easy bolt / one pain in the ass bolt” adjustment
system. Old or new, they are secure, comfortable and nice
looking.
Unfortunately
we couldn’t come up with a 2003 Campy record set, so we had to
run the 2004 Set which differs in ways we can’t tell, but
looks flashier. The Cranks are FSA of course, as their Team
Issue set is dollar for dollar and gram for gram better than
their competition (Sorry Campy and Colnago…)…
Bars were
the standard 3t Prima 199’s and the stem was Colnago’s home
badged (a little stouter on the C50 with 4 bolts vs. two… AND
For the Wheels we stuck with swapping back and fourth between
the very nice and light Reynolds Stratus Tubulars and their
American Classics Very Nice and light Clinchers. We rode each
bike one after the other with the same wheels so as not to let
the most important component sway the test…
So
what’s the difference? For the Record, 19 high end
bikes have passed between my legs in the last couple years
while the C40 has stayed. Not for any other reason but that I
can ride it forever and never feel bad. But if I had to
comment I would say… It is the perfect Geometry for me with
the bars where they should be, the seat angle is nice and head
tube is laid back enough to where it is never twitchy. It is
also lighter than most. It’s a little stiffer than a lot
available at this weight. Carbon Fiber done this well
basically has no fatigue life, meaning you can ride it for a
very very long time (much longer than most of the super light
but throw it away after a season metal on the market).
It has a Stop you dead in your tracks paint job that
nobody has come close to (although the Pinarello Green Jersey
bike I had was close and certainly tougher to come by as there
are only three in the USA). And I hate to admit it, but the
fact that no other bike finish has carried the wow factor for
more than a month or two while the Worlds C40 has carried it
for a few years does have its place in an evaluation. And you
need to know how nice the 40 is for the purposes of the
following comparison.
Comfort: Colnago say
the rear end is 5% more flexible vertically while also being
3.5% stiffer. The new C50 is certainly as comfortable as the
C40. That means it is top 5% of any bike to come through here.
Until something else comes along that is leaps and bounds
better, the C40 is the comfort benchmark that all the bikes
have to shoot for.
Geometry: The 50 is the 40 so
the Geometry is still basically a custom fit for me (who cares
about you…). It is relaxed ride for hours without worry
comfort which is one of the main reasons so many pro’s stick
with it.
Finish: is another work of art, and
while I like the C40 better (with the Mapei Logo and cubes and
Oscar Friere’s Signature and the bright white), my wife says
less White and more Carbon makes it look “newer” and “it will
match more clothes”….
Ride: Both are Pillow
soft. Manufacturers that can’t pull off a ride this stable,
quiet and smooth call the feel “dead”. Funny, because dead or
asleep is what my hands and ass feel after getting jittered
about on most other materials besides Carbon, and this is
great among Good Carbon. Silky smooth and very stable. Ride
all day and Play all night… Sound Italian to
you?
Stiffness: This was the one thing that made
the C40 a second choice for shorter distance performance like
30 minute or short track Crits. I know Colnago say that the
rear is 3.5% less flexy, but they don’t comment on what the
larger head, top and down tubes do. There is also the factor
of the heavier and probably stiffer front fork to consider.
With all that in play, the 50 feels far more than 3.5% better
in the flex department… It is a larger improvement in
stiffness than the 5% better comfort was, as both bikes feel
comparably comfortable, but the C50 has more juice. Honestly,
the Kuota Khan had become my new leader in the combined area
of comfort AND stiffness but the C50’s performance means my
next test needs to be loading the same group onto the Kuota
and riding them one after the other with the same wheels to
get a better look (yeah, life’s pretty rough here at
PEZ…).
So all in all the C50 is a little nicer than the
C40. It’s not hugely better, but the performance boost is
noticeable and with the new tubes, head and stays, it warrants
a new number. That seems like light praise for the C50 only
because the C40 is so sweet! It’s like determining whether or
not 20 nights would be better than 18 with an enamored
Angelina Jolie when just one is more than most of us
deserve.
You can hit the guys at Trailtir-USA.com for a
where to buy link. You can also visit the the
Colnago Dealers
List for some great Deals on Colnago Frames or
complete bikes. |